[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] Proposal: Rename zope package

[Troy Farrell]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Tres Seaver wrote:
|
|> Jim Fulton wrote:
|> ...
|> I've gotten enough negative feedback to "z", that I've added an
|> alternative 4
|> to the proposal:
|>
|>   4. Rename the Zope package to Zope2 and provide a legacy Zope
|>      package
|
| -1, for reasons I've stated before.  This is Zope 3's problem;  we
| *can't* inflict the pain on the large set of installed production
| servers to favor "cleanliness" for the one only installed by
| arrow-backed pioneers.  We would be *much* better off with the status
| quo ante than with such a "solution".
|
| Tres.

- -1 on alternative 4.  This lurker is with Tres.  This is a Z3 challenge.  I
wonder how many part-time Zope 2 admins will be happy about making this change
and having to retest code they've inherited from some contract developer.  As a
developer, this change is attractive.  However, I can't see it as feasible for
the real world.

Troy

- --
And the glory of the LORD shall be revealed, and all flesh shall see it
together: for the mouth of the LORD hath spoken it.
Isaiah 40.5

0xD3BDCA53 http://tjf.us/public.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFAhmbnAykmMtO9ylMRAkcRAJwP4FBU5oosHN/3rESobu2ow7XUiwCff0Gv
yzgfB6TI6uOmDFA3Z3zKn78=
=saog
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----