[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] What do we want to bring from CVS to
Subversion
Tres Seaver
tseaver at zope.com
Mon Apr 26 16:17:04 EDT 2004
Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 15:23, Jim Fulton wrote:
>
>
>>2. Convert the mainline history, but leave off the branches.
>
>
> Would this mean we'd lose the log messages too? If so -1 because often
> merge messages aren't very helpful. "merged foo-bar-branch to head"
> would suck if you couldn't at least see the log messages on that branch.
>
> Otherwise, -0. Disk is cheap but history priceless.
You aren't counting the cost of clutter. Option 3 says "history prior
to the CVS -> SVN migration remains in CVS". We are committed to
leaving the existing CVS repository in place *forever* (or until the 2.7
branch dies, whichever comes first ;).
-1 on merging *any* history prior to the creation of the 2.7 branch to
SVN; -0 on merging the mainline since then.
Tres.
--
===============================================================
Tres Seaver tseaver at zope.com
Zope Corporation "Zope Dealers" http://www.zope.com
More information about the Zope-Dev
mailing list