[Zope-dev] Re: zLOG deprecation?

[Dennis Allison]

We probably want an "ALL" level as well which would map to the "NOTSET" 
of the Python logging code and log everything.

Florent, I don't see a TRACE level in this list.  Did you think one was 
needed?


On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Florent Guillaume wrote:

> Chris Withers wrote:
> >>   # In the days of zLOG, there were 7 standard log levels, and 
> >> ZODB/ZEO used
> >>   # all of them.  Here's how they map to the logging package's 5
> >>  standard
> >>   # levels:
> >>   #
> >>   #    zLOG                         logging
> >>   #    -------------                ---------------
> >>   #    PANIC (300)                  FATAL, CRITICAL (50)
> >>   #    ERROR (200)                  ERROR (40)
> >>   #    WARNING, PROBLEM (100)       WARN (30)
> >>   #    INFO (0)                     INFO (20)
> >>   #    BLATHER (-100)               none -- defined here as BLATHER (15)
> >>   #    DEBUG (-200)                 DEBUG (10)
> > 
> > 
> > imnsho, blather and debug are the wrong way round. blather should go 
> > away completely, it's a stupid name anyway :-(
> 
> Just because you don't see the use in something doesn't mean it has to go away.
> 
> In my book BLATHER is used for "verbose INFO" and is different than DEBUG 
> and TRACE (both levels are useful too). INFO and BLATHER are for the 
> administrator. DEBUG and TRACE are for the developer.
> 
> Florent
> 
> 

--