[Zope-dev] brain.getObject and traversal
Roché Compaan
roche at upfrontsystems.co.za
Thu Mar 31 08:08:41 EST 2005
On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 13:02 +0100, Chris Withers wrote:
> >> Would anyone object if I wrote tests and changed the implementation to
> >> raise exceptions, including Unauthorized, instead of returning None?
> >
> > Unauthorized in getObject is out of the question, that would be new
> > behaviour.
>
> Well, in 2.8, new behaviour is expected, right?
> I really passionately believe that we should not be returnining None in
> Zope 2.8, and since 2.8 hasn't quite hit beta yet I'm very keen to see
> it fixed asap.
>
> Any objections?
No, I agree that it should raise Unauthorized. Just make sure that this
is communicated properly at release time.
--
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za
More information about the Zope-Dev
mailing list