[Zope-dev] Re: relocating Zope 2 core interfaces - a proposal
Philipp von Weitershausen
philipp at weitershausen.de
Fri May 6 10:56:55 EDT 2005
yuppie wrote:
> Proposed Solution
> =================
>
> 1.) Adding ZCML that bridges existing z2 interfaces into the
> 'interfaces' module of their package. [Zope 2.8.0]
+1
> 2.) Copying z3 interfaces from Five.interfaces to the 'interfaces'
> module of the corresponding package. Marking those in Five as Zope 2.7
> backwards compatibility cruft. [Zope 2.8.0]
+1
> 3.) Doing the same for Zope 2.7 with monkey patching code. [Five 1.0+]
I assume here you mean patching in OFS.interfaces, webdav.interfaces etc...
> 4.) Making interfaces.zcml point to the new locations. [Five 1.0+]
>
> 5.) Adding unit tests that verify interfaces and implementations. [Zope
> 2.8.0]
IMHO that's yagni. We actually don't use interfaces that much for
verifying implementations anymore. I think their most common use in Zope
3/Five is documentation, API/schema specification, and easier spelling
for security declarations.
> Risks
> =====
>
> I can't see a way to provide backwards compatibility for
> Products.Five.interfaces.*, but as explained above I'm hopeful this
> doesn't break many Five products.
How and where would we be backward incompatible? I assume that
Five.interfaces would remain where it is, since its definitions are
needed for your point 3) above.
Philipp
More information about the Zope-Dev
mailing list