[Zope-dev] Re: Two visions

[Max M]

Dario Lopez-Kästen wrote:
> Max M said the following on 2006-02-27 17:26:
> 
>> Jim Fulton wrote:
>>
>>> 2) In an alternate vision, Zope 2 evolves to Zope 5.
>>
>>
>>
>> Zope 2 is complicated! It has too many layers of everything.
>>
> 
> read the full sentence that Jim wrote:
> 
>  > 2) In an alternate vision, Zope 2 evolves to Zope 5.
>  >
> ...
>  >
>  >      Note that Zope 5 will leverage Zope 3 technologies to allow a
>  >      variety of configurations, including a Zope 2-like configuration
>  >      with implicit acquisition and through-the-web development, and a
>  >      Zope 3-like configuration that looks a lot like the current Zope
>  >      3 application server.  Maybe, there will be a configuration that
>  >      allows Zope 2 and Zope 3 applications to be combined to a
>  >      significant degree.
> 
> In this scenario I cannot see how much of the old ways of zope2 remain 
> (unless I have a totally unrealistic view of what Jim proposes). zope 2 
> or zop3 become an issue of configuring which "components"/parts to use.


But he also says:

    - Zope 3 doesn't have to reproduce all Zope 2 features.

Which i fear could mean that the Zope 2 stack will hang in there for ever.

I am pretty shure that is not what he meant meant to imply, I just 
wanted to make my view clear.


-- 

hilsen/regards Max M, Denmark

http://www.mxm.dk/
IT's Mad Science