[ZODB-Dev] Re: [Zope-dev] Re: zLOG module deprecated

[Andreas Jung]

--On 10. Januar 2006 12:20:14 +0100 Lennart Regebro <regebro at gmail.com> 
wrote:

> On 1/10/06, Andreas Jung <lists at andreas-jung.com> wrote:
>> This means basically keeping zLOG since it is only a very thin logging
>> module wrapper. So why did we deprecate zLOG? :-)
>
> Did we? It was implemented as a wrapper in 2.8, but wasn't officially
> deprecated until last week. ;-)

Right, with the intention to get rid of zLOG at some point in the future 
(from my memory).

> I still have no opinion on the actual issue. I know what I want, but
> if it has too many drawbacks, I don't want it. :-) Something common
> between Zope3 and Zope2 would probably be a good idea.

That would be the way to go. But I still have my doubts. Zope 3 obviously
does not need a dedicated logging module, why does Zope 2 need one? 
Obviously ZEO (using TRACE) runs on Zope 3 without zLOG so specific 
extension can be handled locally.

To bring this discussion to an end:

 - if we need specific logging functionaliy then it should be implemented
   to be shared between Zope 2 and Zope 3

 - adjusting the current code base from 'logging' to zope.logging would 
mean just to replace the imports (assuming we keep getLogger() factory)....

I am not totally against something like zope.logging but I still don't see 
the real need. We have some months until Zope 2.10 to get this in the right 
way.

-aj
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/attachments/20060110/4dadba11/attachment.bin