[Zope-dev] Re: Time-based releases a good idea?

[Florent Guillaume]

On 15 Jun 2006, at 16:09, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> Chris McDonough wrote:
>> People will get sick of seeing the warnings, and they'll
>> eventually change it, but there's just no reason to *force* them to
>> change it on our time schedule.  And if they don't, who cares?   
>> People
>> who don't want to see the warnings can filter them out.
>>
>> I'm also for reducing duplication, but only to the point that it does
>> not large amounts of break running code.  We have yet to see what the
>> real fallout of changing to the Z3 ZPT implementation is.  It may  
>> be a
>> pure win, but I wouldn't declare victory just yet, at least until we
>> have some empirical evidence that it doesn't break large existing
>> codebases.
>
> Oh, I absolutely agree. Zope 2.10 will need strong testing mostly
> because the ZPT implementation. This was a pretty major change, the  
> few
> heavy discussions we had so far already are good evidence of that  
> (e.g.
> the one on empty path expressions). Given all that, it's still a thing
> we wanted to do and are happy to do. I agree, we can't declare victory
> on the whole war yet, but at least on a few battles... :)

FWIW the CPS 4 trunk (in development for now) works fine with the new  
zpt implementation, provided you use only unicode everywhere, which  
we do.

Thanks Philip for the move to z3 zpt!

Florent

-- 
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France)   Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59   http://nuxeo.com   fg at nuxeo.com