[Zope-dev] Time-based releases vs Bugfixing
Chris Withers
chris at simplistix.co.uk
Mon Jun 19 09:03:50 EDT 2006
Lennart Regebro wrote:
> Only because we have more stable releases,
"only"? That's the big problem here ;-)
>> 1. That's all well and good until you _need_ some feature like MVCC and
>> are then forced to do an upgrade which breaks prettymuch every one of
>> your products.
>
> And the difference is that this didn't happen very often during 2.6 to
> 2.8, because there were no new features to _need_. That's not a good
> thing. Zope2 development stood pretty much still for several years. We
> are no picking up the slack, and yes, that means loads of rapid
> changes. The alternative is stagnation and ultimately death.
I'm not sure I agree. Feature complete and stable is where most
frameworks want to be.
I'd suggest that constant churn and _need_ for upgrades is the way to
ultimately die ;-)
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
More information about the Zope-Dev
mailing list