[Zope-dev] IMO ZClasses should stay
Stefan H. Holek
stefan at epy.co.at
Sat Mar 25 03:49:12 EST 2006
+1
I have handed systems with a thin ZClass layer on top to semi-
developers and they were *easily* able to take it from there. These
are people who would never have grokked (and bothered with) disk-
based Python development and all the mumbo-jumbo it entails.
No other system has anything even remotely like this. People are
*blown away* by the power of building objects TTW (define some
properties, write a few scripts and templates, done!). Take that RoR,
Django, Vignette, Broadvision, ... ;-)
Of course ZClasses have their limitations, but I fully agree that
this is first and foremost a documentation problem.
Stefan
On 24. Mär 2006, at 17:25, Jim Fulton wrote:
> On the subject of deprecation, for the record, I think removing
> ZClasses is a mistake. They have legitimate uses. They have major
> flaws too. It would help if we would more clearly document their
> limitations and pitfalls, rather than get rid of them, at least
> until we have something better,
--
Anything that happens, happens. --Douglas Adams
More information about the Zope-Dev
mailing list