[Zope-dev] Request typing (to get the xmlrpc layer discussion
finished)
Janko Hauser
jh at zscout.de
Mon Dec 17 10:07:29 EST 2007
Am 17.12.2007 um 15:40 schrieb Jim Fulton:
>
> On Dec 17, 2007, at 8:22 AM, Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> a couple of weeks ago there was some discussion about the skin/
>> layer support for XML-RPC which I implemented without asking
>> (shame on me). As some time has passed now everybody could have
>> some fresh thoughts about it.
>>
>>
>> Let me first summarise:
>>
>> * Skin and layers should be seen as typing the request.
>>
>> * There are no general objections against having layers for XML-RPC.
>
>
> I have a general objection for reasons of complexity. Why do we
> need this?
About the specifics with skins for other protocols than http I can
not say much.
> In fact, I find skins in general to introduce more complexity than
> they're worth.
This baffles me somewhat. At the moment I see skins/layers as the
only mechanism to let developers using an application to customize
it, possibly more than once in the same instance. I find them not
optimal, because they only allow customizing on the outer most level.
But overrides is a failure as I understand it. I understand, that
there is a trend to distinguish between "libraries" (with less zcml)
and "applications" (with zcml to configure reused libraries). But on
the level of applications I know of no other mechanism than layers.
So what should be used or invented instead? As a usecase take a forum
application which should be installed more than once in an instance
but needs different layouts and also different subset of functionality.
With regards,
__Janko
--
Janko Hauser email: jhauser at zscout.de
mobile: +49 1721 641552
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 155 bytes
Desc: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
Url : http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/attachments/20071217/74bc22ad/PGP.bin
More information about the Zope-Dev
mailing list