[Zope-dev] Re: straighting out the SQLAlchemy integration mess
Martin Aspeli
optilude at gmx.net
Wed Apr 9 20:56:43 EDT 2008
Laurence Rowe wrote:
> Should one phase commit be set as the default to make it easier to work
> with sqlite (and mssql)? Probably yes.
Ideally we'd guess based on the URL scheme but allow it to be set
explicitly, IMHO. Single phase would be the fallback, I guess.
> Should the default be for sessions to start out `active` or `dirty`? If
> they start out `dirty` then existing 1.0 code should work as before.
What are the implications of having them start out dirty?
> It'll probably be next week before I manage to get this tidied up and
> merged back to trunk.
Martin
--
Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who
want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book
More information about the Zope-Dev
mailing list