[Zope-dev] Re: [Plone-developers] PAULA: bringing Zope 3's authentication to Plone and beyond

[Andreas Jung]

--On 13. Juli 2008 19:38:01 +0300 Mark Hammond <mhammond at skippinet.com.au> 
wrote:


>
>> Since Zope3 is not a successor to Zope2 but a
>> completely different thing I do not think this is problematic.
>
> That too seems a shame to me.  So if I found myself with an investment in
> Zope2 but was looking to the future, Zope3 will not even *attempt* to
> provide a smoother path for me than, say, moving to django or another
> alternative framework?

How about GROK?

>
> I guess the fact the first 4 letters of "zope2" and "zope3" being the same
> did imply some sense of continuation in at least *some* things...

That's reason why the term "zope 3" should be phased out and replaced with 
"Zope web components" or something similar. You're not the only one being 
confused by this.

-aj
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/attachments/20080713/b2c17a28/attachment.bin