[Zope-dev] lxml and z3c.form strategy?

[Tres Seaver]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Roger Ineichen wrote:

> I decided after along night, trying to compile 
> lxml on a windows box, that we will not use 
> lxml and lxml based packages like z3c.form,
> z3c.template, z3c.macro etc at some of our 
> windows servers.

Roger, I don't understand why you feel this way:  there are perfectly
usable binary eggs available for Windows, aren't there?  I know that no
Windows binaries are available yet for lxml 2.1.2, which has been out
for all of 10 days, but they are available for 2.1.1.

> We have to find a strategy to keep this packages 
> free of lxml and implement the z3c.pt support in 
> this packages in a different way.

- -1.  There is not much point in z3c.pt at all without lxml, which is
where the speed boost comes from.

> I really like your lxml based z3c.pt work. It's 
> nice and incredible fast.

It won't be fast if we rip out the lxml.

> What do you think about that? 
> 
> I know it's a hugh amount of work, but I'm willing
> to help with the refactoring if you like.


Tres.
- --
===================================================================
Tres Seaver          +1 540-429-0999          tseaver at palladion.com
Palladion Software   "Excellence by Design"    http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIzyPL+gerLs4ltQ4RAr+3AJ4jh/8JPVazel2q9Hpz4ab60olqPgCgsK1B
WlNc8FAiGHG/CUAa/pShLUI=
=DoFh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----