[Zope-dev] Zope 4.0, maybe not such a bad idea...

[Martijn Faassen]

Chris Withers wrote:
> Gary Poster wrote:
>> Within the constraints above, then, in line with your original proposal, 
>> I think we'd be fine with "Zope Framework," and "Zope 2."  We certainly 
>> don't need Zope-3-the-tarball, if that's what you meant.
> 
> Zope Framework (and maybe even ZF4) seems to have general agreement.
> 
> "Zope 2" can't stay as is, because people stick in in the chain of:
> Zope 1, Zope 2, Zope 3, Zope Framework 4
> ...so there will be confusion.

This isn't a chain. Zope Framework is not Zope the app server. It's a 
collection of libraries used by Zope 2 and Zope 3.

Regards,

Martijn