[Zope-dev] Zope.pipeline proposal
Tres Seaver
tseaver at palladion.com
Wed Feb 25 12:46:00 EST 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Tres Seaver wrote:
> Roger Ineichen wrote:
>> Hi Shane
>
>>> Betreff: [Zope-dev] Zope.pipeline proposal
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I've put up a draft of a zope.pipeline proposal:
>>>
>>> http://wiki.zope.org/zope3/ZopePipeline
>>>
>>> The proposal is intended to explain my thoughts on the
>>> subject more thoroughly.
>> Do you know something about the performance of WSGI?
>
>> I whould be happy to see some perfomance tests comparing
>> WSGI with other server concepts.
Sorry for following up to myself: I had meant to include links to the
recent "songlist" thread which examined "raw" WSGI vs. various frameworks:
- - The original, "raw WSGI" writeup:
http://www.eflorenzano.com/blog/post/writing-blazing-fast-infinitely-scalable-pure-wsgi/
- - Martijn Faassen's Grok take:
http://faassen.n--tree.net/blog/view/weblog/2009/01/10/0
- - Carlos de la Guardia's repoze.bfg writeup:
http://blog.delaguardia.com.mx/index.php?op=ViewArticle&articleId=119&blogId=1
Please note the comparison Carlos makes between "raw" WSGI on his box,
using the default Paste http server (1780 requests/second) vs. the
repoze.bfg version with the same server (1060 requests/second).
Tres.
- --
===================================================================
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver at palladion.com
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFJpYPX+gerLs4ltQ4RAiihAJwNxxxiU3L8c2aBCyE1D6qu3CfHYQCgySlm
LpYSFDGcULBueL/9+Oz2OjE=
=4a6d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Zope-Dev
mailing list