[Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 6, OK: 17

[Jim Fulton]

On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 3:15 AM, Adam GROSZER <agroszer.ll at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> On 12/02/2012 02:55 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Zope tests summarizer <noreply at zope.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> [1]    FAILED  winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32
>>>
>>> https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/069693.html
>>>
>>>
>>> [2]    FAILED  winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64
>>>
>>> https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/069694.html
>>>
>>>
>>> [3]    FAILED  winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32
>>>
>>> https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/069695.html
>>>
>>>
>>> [4]    FAILED  winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64
>>>
>>> https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/069696.html
>>
>>
>> This is due to the release yesterday.
>>
>> I can and will "fix" this, by providing a test extra, but this will only
>> cause no tests to run.  The fix may be needed for test of third-party
>> packages that depend on ZODB3 [test].
>>
>> The winbot needs to be modified to run the tests for persistent,
>> BTrees, ZODB and ZEO separately.
>
>
> I think the winbot does the right job.
> Those tests are running against
>
> svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/ZODB/trunk
>
> Now the tests pass as you added [test] back:

Ah, there was a bug in the buildout config, which I just fixed.
There's no way that ZODB should be depending on ZODB3,
even in the buildout.

Jim

-- 
Jim Fulton
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jimfulton
Jerky is better than bacon! http://zo.pe/Kqm