[Zope-PAS] PAS Caching (sucks)
Jens Vagelpohl
jens at dataflake.org
Sun Jul 30 11:32:48 EDT 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 29 Jul 2006, at 11:44, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
> | You do still need to configure the PAS instance to actually do
> | caching. But this seems OK. I think you can just ignore caching
> | when creating plugins if this is all you want. Even though the
> | ZCacheable API sucks, the indirection here is good. I wouldn't want
> | PAS itself to have a hard-wired caching implementation in it, and I
> | don't mind associating the PAS instance with a cache manager.
>
> Same here. I am fine with the use of ZCacheable. It also can be used
> with other cache implementations, for example the
> MemcachedCacheManager to share the cache between multiple instances.
OK, no problem. I won't harp about it again. Still hate it. ;)
jens
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFEzNEhRAx5nvEhZLIRArhzAJ4io/iRmdIGzlNz6jvmHU1hD6E/iACdHWd1
048di+XZ7Z2O704kLkOH6M8=
=zb5V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Zope-PAS
mailing list