[Zope-PAS] Re: Test layers for pastc
Tres Seaver
tseaver at palladion.com
Mon Nov 19 17:03:02 EST 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ross Patterson wrote:
> Tres Seaver <tseaver-npLdOuuzvjyaMJb+Lgu22Q at public.gmane.org> writes:
>
>> Ross Patterson wrote:
>>
>>> I'd love to convert PAS's tests to layers for test setUp and tearDown.
>>> Any objections?
>> Layers are all about sharing setup across a set of tests, which means
>> they risk breaking test isolation. I normally don't use layers for
>> anything which is a pure "unit test," but can see the point for
>> "function" or "integration" tests.
>>
>> Are there a specific set of tests you have in mind which have
>> significant setup / teardown costs?
>
> Well I also find that layers make factoring and re-using setup much
> easier, so that was my motivation. If that's an abuse of the intentions
> of layers, then nevermind. :)
Hmm, I guess I would need to see the specific changes you have in mind.
If the "shared setup" in the layer creates state which coould
potentially be "scribbled on" by one or more tests, then I "agin'it", at
least for unit testing.
I'd rather rewrite tests to *remove* code from setup (creating fixtures
by calling helper methods / functions in the test case), than try to
make shared fixtures more efficient to create.
Tres.
- --
===================================================================
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver at palladion.com
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHQggW+gerLs4ltQ4RAmq2AJ9kC9t1eBTmfXqzbIWtClDIRiekLQCeOgDM
kvxXDq08ULB5GargRRQceB4=
=0KTf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Zope-PAS
mailing list