From lalo@hackandroll.org  Mon Oct  2 18:05:13 2000
From: lalo@hackandroll.org (Lalo Martins)
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 15:05:13 -0200
Subject: [ZWeb] ZWN: HiperDom 0.1 is out
Message-ID: <20001002150513.A25611@hackandroll.org>

HiperDom 0.1 is out at http://www.zope.org/Members/lalo/HiperDom .
We would like as many people as possible to test it and give us
feedback before the next step.

This version is Python-based, fully functional and HelpSys'ed.
Heck, it even has an icon (a burning tree) ;-)

[]s,
                                               |alo
                                               +----
--
          Hack and Roll  ( http://www.hackandroll.org )
            News for, uh, whatever it is that we are.


http://zope.gf.com.br/lalo           mailto:lalo@hackandroll.org
         pgp key: http://zope.gf.com.br/lalo/pessoal/pgp

Brazil of Darkness (RPG)    ---     http://zope.gf.com.br/BroDar


From roeder@berg.net  Thu Oct  5 00:24:30 2000
From: roeder@berg.net (Maik Roeder)
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 01:24:30 +0200
Subject: [ZWeb] Documentation section Wiki updated
Message-ID: <39DBBC2E.FB8B4F65@berg.net>

Hi !


I have added a summary of the past discussion of the new /Documentation
section to the Wiki:

http://www.zope.org/Wikis/zope-web/DocumentationOrganization

Best regards,

Maik Röder

-- 
Uzopia - Digging la vida Zopa - http://uzopia.editthispage.com


From jim@digicool.com  Thu Oct  5 23:25:17 2000
From: jim@digicool.com (Jim Fulton)
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 18:25:17 -0400
Subject: [ZWeb] Heads up: I'm ZEOfying the Wikis area on zope.org
Message-ID: <39DCFFCD.4681BC0@digicool.com>

There's bound to be some, hopefully minor, disruption.

Jim

--
Jim Fulton           mailto:jim@digicool.com   Python Powered!        
Technical Director   (888) 344-4332            http://www.python.org  
Digital Creations    http://www.digicool.com   http://www.zope.org    

Under US Code Title 47, Sec.227(b)(1)(C), Sec.227(a)(2)(B) This email
address may not be added to any commercial mail list with out my
permission.  Violation of my privacy with advertising or SPAM will
result in a suit for a MINIMUM of $500 damages/incident, $1500 for
repeats.


From jim@digicool.com  Thu Oct  5 23:32:58 2000
From: jim@digicool.com (Jim Fulton)
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 18:32:58 -0400
Subject: [ZWeb] Heads up: I'm ZEOfying the Wikis area on zope.org
References: <39DCFFCD.4681BC0@digicool.com>
Message-ID: <39DD019A.46556A9B@digicool.com>

Jim Fulton wrote:
> 
> There's bound to be some, hopefully minor, disruption.

OK, I'm done. :)

Jim


--
Jim Fulton           mailto:jim@digicool.com   Python Powered!        
Technical Director   (888) 344-4332            http://www.python.org  
Digital Creations    http://www.digicool.com   http://www.zope.org    

Under US Code Title 47, Sec.227(b)(1)(C), Sec.227(a)(2)(B) This email
address may not be added to any commercial mail list with out my
permission.  Violation of my privacy with advertising or SPAM will
result in a suit for a MINIMUM of $500 damages/incident, $1500 for
repeats.


From roeder@berg.net  Sun Oct  8 17:35:34 2000
From: roeder@berg.net (Maik Roeder)
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2000 18:35:34 +0200
Subject: [ZWeb] Error in Zope.org Search
Message-ID: <39E0A256.C4E1DB8E@berg.net>

Hi !

I did a search on Zope.org for 4DOM, and received a list of
Wiki links that lead to nowhere.

Example:
http://www.zope.org//Wikis/zope-xml/Aquisition kills get_ownerDocument

Seems like there is an url_quote missing in
http://www.zope.org/SiteIndex/search/view_source:

<a href="<dtml-var BASE1>/<dtml-var url>"><!--#var title_or_id size=30--></a>

Regards,

Maik Röder

-- 
Uzopia - Digging la vida Zopa - http://uzopia.editthispage.com


From mindlace@digicool.com  Mon Oct  9 13:27:17 2000
From: mindlace@digicool.com (ethan mindlace fremen)
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 08:27:17 -0400
Subject: [ZWeb] Error in Zope.org Search
References: <39E0A256.C4E1DB8E@berg.net>
Message-ID: <39E1B9A5.5701CA3D@digicool.com>

Maik Roeder wrote:
> 
> Hi !
> 
> I did a search on Zope.org for 4DOM, and received a list of
> Wiki links that lead to nowhere.
> 
> Example:
> http://www.zope.org//Wikis/zope-xml/Aquisition kills get_ownerDocument
> 
> Seems like there is an url_quote missing in
> http://www.zope.org/SiteIndex/search/view_source:
> 
> <a href="<dtml-var BASE1>/<dtml-var url>"><!--#var title_or_id size=30--></a>

Yup.  Fixed.  Thanks, Maik.

~ethan


From mindlace@digicool.com  Mon Oct  9 16:48:56 2000
From: mindlace@digicool.com (ethan mindlace fremen)
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 11:48:56 -0400
Subject: [ZWeb] how-to categorization
Message-ID: <39E1E8E8.2F009C4F@digicool.com>

Zopatistas,

I'm still working on the categorization and intend to have it done by
this evening.

~ethan


From mindlace@digicool.com  Tue Oct 10 21:15:44 2000
From: mindlace@digicool.com (mindlace)
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 16:15:44 -0400
Subject: [ZWeb] Re: [Zope] Zope.org Feature Request - Product Download Counter
References: <p0500190bb608b7a35225@[192.168.10.2]> <003201c032dc$47911be0$ae03a8c0@fork>
Message-ID: <39E378F0.FEA4146E@digicool.com>

Andy McKay wrote:
> 
> Of course the only problem with a hit counter is that high traffic requests
> mean continually writing the object into the ZODB each time it gets hit /
> downloaded, whatever. Thats why I release FSCounter which uses the file
> system. I would like to expand this to cover multiple objects...

The problem is slightly more complicated than this:  We have Apache
cache file and image objects.  This is a good thing, because they are
static, and Apache will *always* be better than Zope at serving static
content. This is a bad thing, because direct requests for files don't
ever make it to Zope.

Nonetheless, this doesn't affect the /view method.

Further, we now have the feature that the listing of products shows the
latest version, no /view method in the middle, for your direct download.

I may be able to do some parsing of the apache log files for those
things that end in tgz, tar.gz , and zip.  This would be somewhat
canonical, except for the fact that because we have cache headers set on
the file objects, they are cached downstream, and so many requests for
cache objects will never make it to our Apache at all.

~ethan

p.s. I'd really appreciate it if requests for improvements of zope.org
be sent to zope-web@zope.org.



From andym@ActiveState.com  Tue Oct 10 22:17:16 2000
From: andym@ActiveState.com (Andy McKay)
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:17:16 -0700
Subject: [ZWeb] Re: [Zope] Zope.org Feature Request - Product Download Counter
References: <p0500190bb608b7a35225@[192.168.10.2]> <003201c032dc$47911be0$ae03a8c0@fork> <39E378F0.FEA4146E@digicool.com>
Message-ID: <001d01c032ff$772c5fe0$ae03a8c0@fork>

Yes Apache and caching adds a whole new layer of complexity.

But most simple Zope installations dont use it and for quick rough counts it
can be useful, of course its rare to be able to replace the log files in
terms of accuracy.

----- Original Message -----
From: "mindlace" <mindlace@digicool.com>
To: <zope@zope.org>
Cc: <zope-web@zope.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 1:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope] Zope.org Feature Request - Product Download Counter


> Andy McKay wrote:
> >
> > Of course the only problem with a hit counter is that high traffic
requests
> > mean continually writing the object into the ZODB each time it gets hit
/
> > downloaded, whatever. Thats why I release FSCounter which uses the file
> > system. I would like to expand this to cover multiple objects...
>
> The problem is slightly more complicated than this:  We have Apache
> cache file and image objects.  This is a good thing, because they are
> static, and Apache will *always* be better than Zope at serving static
> content. This is a bad thing, because direct requests for files don't
> ever make it to Zope.
>
> Nonetheless, this doesn't affect the /view method.
>
> Further, we now have the feature that the listing of products shows the
> latest version, no /view method in the middle, for your direct download.
>
> I may be able to do some parsing of the apache log files for those
> things that end in tgz, tar.gz , and zip.  This would be somewhat
> canonical, except for the fact that because we have cache headers set on
> the file objects, they are cached downstream, and so many requests for
> cache objects will never make it to our Apache at all.
>
> ~ethan
>
> p.s. I'd really appreciate it if requests for improvements of zope.org
> be sent to zope-web@zope.org.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
> http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
> **   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
> (Related lists -
>  http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
>  http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
>



From tdickenson@geminidataloggers.com  Wed Oct 11 09:52:19 2000
From: tdickenson@geminidataloggers.com (Toby Dickenson)
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:52:19 +0100
Subject: [ZWeb] Re: [Zope] Zope.org Feature Request - Product Download Counter
In-Reply-To: <39E378F0.FEA4146E@digicool.com>
References: <p0500190bb608b7a35225@[192.168.10.2]> <003201c032dc$47911be0$ae03a8c0@fork> <39E378F0.FEA4146E@digicool.com>
Message-ID: <caa8usogbanoe9cc0hj1vmvem1t0tnv6hl@4ax.com>

On Tue, 10 Oct 2000 16:15:44 -0400, mindlace <mindlace@digicool.com>
wrote:

>Andy McKay wrote:
>> 
>> Of course the only problem with a hit counter is that high traffic requests
>> mean continually writing the object into the ZODB each time it gets hit /
>> downloaded, whatever. Thats why I release FSCounter which uses the file
>> system. I would like to expand this to cover multiple objects...
>
>The problem is slightly more complicated than this:  We have Apache
>cache file and image objects.  This is a good thing, because they are
>static, and Apache will *always* be better than Zope at serving static
>content. This is a bad thing, because direct requests for files don't
>ever make it to Zope.

FYI, there is a (mostly successful) way around this if you dont worry
about Zope having to serve up a 304 response for this request..... set
the following header.

Cache-Control: public, s-maxage=0, proxy-revalidate

Caches will cache the content, but always revalidate it before using
the cached reply. 


Toby Dickenson
tdickenson@geminidataloggers.com


From tom.deprez@uz.kuleuven.ac.be  Thu Oct 12 10:41:28 2000
From: tom.deprez@uz.kuleuven.ac.be (Tom Deprez)
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 11:41:28 +0200
Subject: [ZWeb] Docs
Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20001012114128.00951400@poirot>

Hi all,

Just to let you know that I've internet problems at my home. There is
something wrong with my telephone connection (since tuesday) and the
telephone company is searching for the problem.  This also means that I
haven't read any mails send to my home address and thus it's quite possible
that I didn't responded to it. If there is some important news on the docs,
then you can mail me to my company address, otherwise I'll answer when I
can read my home mail again

Tom.


From bjorn@exoweb.net  Fri Oct 13 08:00:43 2000
From: bjorn@exoweb.net (Bjorn Stabell)
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 15:00:43 +0800
Subject: [ZWeb] ZIP mailing list doesn't work;  eevolute.com bankrupt?
Message-ID: <4D2A6B06A4D031478F83DAF3A24B608D9C6D@ntbox.lan.exoweb.net>

I don't know what happened to eevlute.com that hosts the ZIP mailing
list.  Their mailman reports ZIP and their own eevolute mailing lists
both don't exist, and sending email to root, webmaster, postmaster, and
mailman-owner @eevolute.com all reports "relaying denied".  Submitting a
form feedback through their website gives a Python run-time error.  Only
way to contact them is by phone to the Netherlands, which I haven't
tried.

Can you host the ZIP mailing list on zope.org instead?  I think
internationalization is important.

Bye,
-- 
Bjorn Stabell <bjorn@exoweb.net>
Exoweb - One-to-one web solutions
w http://www.exoweb.net/
t +86 13701174004


From mindlace@digicool.com  Fri Oct 13 11:18:48 2000
From: mindlace@digicool.com (ethan mindlace fremen)
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 06:18:48 -0400
Subject: [ZWeb] link cataloguing policy
Message-ID: <39E6E188.124C9953@digicool.com>

Zopatistas,

I've been getting a lot of requests to catalog links that are not
directly related to zope and not zope powered, like people's homepages
(not zope powered) and places like Andover.net (not zope powered, or
about zope).

Should I catalog these kind of links?

~ethan


From mindlace@digicool.com  Fri Oct 13 11:30:31 2000
From: mindlace@digicool.com (ethan mindlace fremen)
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 06:30:31 -0400
Subject: [ZWeb] ZIP mailing list doesn't work;  eevolute.com bankrupt?
References: <4D2A6B06A4D031478F83DAF3A24B608D9C6D@ntbox.lan.exoweb.net>
Message-ID: <39E6E447.DC5A95CA@digicool.com>

Bjorn Stabell wrote:
> 
> I don't know what happened to eevlute.com that hosts the ZIP mailing
> list.  Their mailman reports ZIP and their own eevolute mailing lists
> both don't exist, and sending email to root, webmaster, postmaster, and
> mailman-owner @eevolute.com all reports "relaying denied".  Submitting a
> form feedback through their website gives a Python run-time error.  Only
> way to contact them is by phone to the Netherlands, which I haven't
> tried.
> 
> Can you host the ZIP mailing list on zope.org instead?  I think
> internationalization is important.

Yes, no problem.  is ZIP the name you want? or zope-i18n to match with
zope-dev, zope- etc

~ethan

> Bye,
> --
> Bjorn Stabell <bjorn@exoweb.net>
> Exoweb - One-to-one web solutions
> w http://www.exoweb.net/
> t +86 13701174004
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Zope-web maillist  -  Zope-web@zope.org
> http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-web


From mindlace@digicool.com  Mon Oct 16 11:26:23 2000
From: mindlace@digicool.com (ethan mindlace fremen)
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 06:26:23 -0400
Subject: [ZWeb] technical overview
Message-ID: <39EAD7CF.8484DFBA@digicool.com>

Do we have any volunteers to adress this gentleman's request for a "one
page" technical overview of zope?

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: zope web site
To: "ethan mindlace fremen" <mindlace@digicool.com>

A tour is a very different thing from a good, single page technical
overview
with diagrams that can be easily absorbed by a technical person. 
Tutorials
take time and assuming that I want to spend time at your site is not a
valid
assumption.

You need to understand that Internet users are prepared to give
something a
short amount of time to try to understand something, but if this
abbreviated, yet informative overview isn't available, then they'll just
move on.


From tom.deprez@uz.kuleuven.ac.be  Mon Oct 16 15:35:03 2000
From: tom.deprez@uz.kuleuven.ac.be (Tom Deprez)
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 16:35:03 +0200
Subject: [ZWeb] Adjusting the how-to's
Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20001016163503.00910410@poirot>

Hi,

I'm trying to work on the topics of the how-to's. But, when I try to save
the changes, it looks like Zope isn't getting through. My browser keeps
waiting for a reply of Zope.org. Are there some troubles?

Tom.


From mindlace@digicool.com  Mon Oct 16 11:45:15 2000
From: mindlace@digicool.com (ethan mindlace fremen)
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 06:45:15 -0400
Subject: [ZWeb] Adjusting the how-to's
References: <3.0.6.32.20001016163503.00910410@poirot>
Message-ID: <39EADC3B.77BF7042@digicool.com>

Tom Deprez wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm trying to work on the topics of the how-to's. But, when I try to save
> the changes, it looks like Zope isn't getting through. My browser keeps
> waiting for a reply of Zope.org. Are there some troubles?

Yes, zope is falling down :(.  We're putting in more debugging to see
what's up.

~ethan


From tom.deprez@uz.kuleuven.ac.be  Mon Oct 16 15:46:52 2000
From: tom.deprez@uz.kuleuven.ac.be (Tom Deprez)
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 16:46:52 +0200
Subject: [ZWeb] Installation etc
Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20001016164652.00911c00@poirot>

Hi,

In which audience (dev/use) are we going to place the how-to's on apache,
installation ... ?
Wouldn't be an admin (adm) audience be good too?

Tom.


From tom.deprez@uz.kuleuven.ac.be  Mon Oct 16 15:50:35 2000
From: tom.deprez@uz.kuleuven.ac.be (Tom Deprez)
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 16:50:35 +0200
Subject: [ZWeb] Tpics
Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20001016165035.00910420@poirot>

Is there a possibility to add a Topic 'Products'? So that we can select
'Python' and 'Product', or a Topic 'Python Product', however I think
splitting these 2 up gives more possibilities for other products.

Tom.


From mindlace@digicool.com  Mon Oct 16 12:32:22 2000
From: mindlace@digicool.com (ethan mindlace fremen)
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 07:32:22 -0400
Subject: [ZWeb] Installation etc
References: <3.0.6.32.20001016164652.00911c00@poirot>
Message-ID: <39EAE746.D7DD8EB4@digicool.com>

Tom Deprez wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> In which audience (dev/use) are we going to place the how-to's on apache,
> installation ... ?
> Wouldn't be an admin (adm) audience be good too?

It might be, but I'm not positive we have the material to justify
developing another subsection of the site.  Right now, let's call it a
use, the same way that things that might be biz (server comparisons,
etc) will be considered "use" for now.

~ethan


From jatwood@bwanazulia.com  Mon Oct 16 16:33:09 2000
From: jatwood@bwanazulia.com (J. Atwood)
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:33:09 -0400
Subject: [ZWeb] Zope Discussion Forum @ DevShed.com
Message-ID: <B61097F5.10B8B%jatwood@bwanazulia.com>

http://www.devshed.com/cgi-bin/ubb/forumdisplay.cgi?action=topics&forum=Zope
&number=10&DaysPrune=60&LastLogin=

I found this awhile ago and it has been pretty inactive (until last week
when I started posting.. :) ). It would be great to see some of the list
subscribers here and other members of the Zope community get involved. It is
something that I think is much needed on Zope.org (A bulletin board
system... I am SURE that I could suggest one!) as it helps Newbies and
provides a more solid, long lasting and manageable discussion.

Maybe something for ZDP if not for Zope.org.

Comments? Suggestions?

Thanks,
J





From paul@digicool.com  Mon Oct 16 17:42:16 2000
From: paul@digicool.com (Paul Everitt)
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 09:42:16 -0700
Subject: [ZWeb] link cataloguing policy
References: <39E6E188.124C9953@digicool.com>
Message-ID: <39EB2FE8.416A0229@digicool.com>

The litmus test should be:

  "Is it relevant to Zope.org readers?"

A lot of these folks are interested in the following question:

  "How do I drive more hits to my site?"

:^)

Thus, your instincts are right.

--Paul

ethan mindlace fremen wrote:
> 
> Zopatistas,
> 
> I've been getting a lot of requests to catalog links that are not
> directly related to zope and not zope powered, like people's homepages
> (not zope powered) and places like Andover.net (not zope powered, or
> about zope).
> 
> Should I catalog these kind of links?
> 
> ~ethan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Zope-web maillist  -  Zope-web@zope.org
> http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-web

-- 

--Paul

Paul Everitt       Digital Creations
paul@digicool.com  540.371.6909
-----------------------------------------
The Open Source Zope application server
http://www.zope.org/
-----------------------------------------


From chrism@digicool.com  Tue Oct 17 05:20:29 2000
From: chrism@digicool.com (Chris McDonough)
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 00:20:29 -0400
Subject: [ZWeb] "current" direct zope download link
Message-ID: <39EBD38D.D20A74E0@digicool.com>

Ethan,

It would be great to establish a direct "current" download link for the
most recent version of Zope.  I put Zope up at WinFiles.com a while ago,
and they require that you submit a link to the actual software so people
can click on it and download it right from the winfiles site...
Currently, the link still points to 2.2.0.  I'm going to change it, but
this is probably unmaintainable in the long term.  I know we have the
current version number aliased for show on the front page so it's
probably not much of a job to establish "currency" of the actual
download link.   If you're so inclined, it'd be nice.  Otherwise.. well,
you know.

-- 
Chris McDonough
Digital Creations, Publishers of Zope
http://www.zope.org


From mindlace@digicool.com  Tue Oct 17 15:03:22 2000
From: mindlace@digicool.com (mindlace)
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 10:03:22 -0400
Subject: [ZWeb] "current" direct zope download link
References: <39EBD38D.D20A74E0@digicool.com>
Message-ID: <39EC5C2A.32D1423E@digicool.com>

Chris McDonough wrote:
> 
> Ethan,
> 
> It would be great to establish a direct "current" download link for the
> most recent version of Zope.  

In which form -linux, win, solaris, src? Should I do a current for each
of the zope packages we have?

> I put Zope up at WinFiles.com a while ago,
> and they require that you submit a link to the actual software so people
> can click on it and download it right from the winfiles site...
> Currently, the link still points to 2.2.0.  I'm going to change it, but
> this is probably unmaintainable in the long term.  I know we have the
> current version number aliased for show on the front page so it's
> probably not much of a job to establish "currency" of the actual
> download link.   If you're so inclined, it'd be nice.  Otherwise.. well,
> you know.

~ethan


From chrism@digicool.com  Tue Oct 17 15:33:05 2000
From: chrism@digicool.com (Chris McDonough)
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 10:33:05 -0400
Subject: [ZWeb] "current" direct zope download link
References: <39EBD38D.D20A74E0@digicool.com> <39EC5C2A.32D1423E@digicool.com>
Message-ID: <00a201c03847$297ac8c0$1f48a4d8@kurtz>


> Chris McDonough wrote:
> > 
> > Ethan,
> > 
> > It would be great to establish a direct "current" download link for the
> > most recent version of Zope.  
> 
> In which form -linux, win, solaris, src? Should I do a current for each
> of the zope packages we have?

Oh.  Yeah.  I guess so.  Solaris, Windows, Linux, and source, I suppose.



From Uwe Mueller <Mueller.home@planet-interkom.de>  Thu Oct 19 07:58:38 2000
From: Uwe Mueller <Mueller.home@planet-interkom.de> (Uwe Mueller)
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 08:58:38 +0200
Subject: [ZWeb] (no subject)
Message-ID: <741740557.20001019085838@planet-interkom.de>

Hallo zope-web,

  


-- 




From jim@digicool.com  Thu Oct 19 15:04:45 2000
From: jim@digicool.com (Jim Fulton)
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 10:04:45 -0400
Subject: [ZWeb] I'm going to restart zope.org
Message-ID: <39EEFF7D.2BCB609@digicool.com>

The Wiki page permissions (in the ZWiki code itself) are wrong, 
which is preventing me from using FTP (emacs) with the wikis.

Jim


--
Jim Fulton           mailto:jim@digicool.com
Technical Director   (888) 344-4332              Python Powered!
Digital Creations    http://www.digicool.com     http://www.python.org

Under US Code Title 47, Sec.227(b)(1)(C), Sec.227(a)(2)(B) This email
address may not be added to any commercial mail list with out my
permission.  Violation of my privacy with advertising or SPAM will
result in a suit for a MINIMUM of $500 damages/incident, $1500 for
repeats.


From jim@digicool.com  Thu Oct 19 15:14:38 2000
From: jim@digicool.com (Jim Fulton)
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 10:14:38 -0400
Subject: [ZWeb] I'm going to restart zope.org
References: <39EEFF7D.2BCB609@digicool.com>
Message-ID: <39EF01CE.3FA15F38@digicool.com>

Jim Fulton wrote:
> 
> The Wiki page permissions (in the ZWiki code itself) are wrong,
> which is preventing me from using FTP (emacs) with the wikis.

We can now edit the Zope.org wikis with FTP. Yee ha!

Jim

--
Jim Fulton           mailto:jim@digicool.com
Technical Director   (888) 344-4332              Python Powered!
Digital Creations    http://www.digicool.com     http://www.python.org

Under US Code Title 47, Sec.227(b)(1)(C), Sec.227(a)(2)(B) This email
address may not be added to any commercial mail list with out my
permission.  Violation of my privacy with advertising or SPAM will
result in a suit for a MINIMUM of $500 damages/incident, $1500 for
repeats.


From chrisw@nipltd.com  Fri Oct 20 09:30:43 2000
From: chrisw@nipltd.com (Chris Withers)
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:30:43 +0100
Subject: [ZWeb] I'm going to restart zope.org
References: <39EEFF7D.2BCB609@digicool.com> <39EF01CE.3FA15F38@digicool.com>
Message-ID: <39F002B3.473B3827@nipltd.com>

Jim Fulton wrote:
> 
> Jim Fulton wrote:
> >
> > The Wiki page permissions (in the ZWiki code itself) are wrong,
> > which is preventing me from using FTP (emacs) with the wikis.
> 
> We can now edit the Zope.org wikis with FTP. Yee ha!

Perhaps someone could write a short how-to on doing this, and, in fact,
accessing stuff on Zope.org through FTP in general. I can never remember
the port number, and I wonder how I'd go about playing with stuff in my
member folder using FTP?

cheers,

Chris


From mindlace@digicool.com  Fri Oct 20 13:42:52 2000
From: mindlace@digicool.com (ethan mindlace fremen)
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:42:52 -0400
Subject: [ZWeb] CSS personalization possible
Message-ID: <39F03DCC.8065E275@digicool.com>

Zopatistas,

OK, I've finally made it so that you can put a my_css object in your
member folder and it will be used in lieu of the existing folder.

-- 
-mindlace-
Zopatista Community Liason


From mindlace@digicool.com  Mon Oct 23 17:49:05 2000
From: mindlace@digicool.com (ethan mindlace fremen)
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 12:49:05 -0400
Subject: [ZWeb] Re: [Zope] Zope.org Feature Request - Product Download Counter
References: <p0500190bb608b7a35225@[192.168.10.2]> <003201c032dc$47911be0$ae03a8c0@fork> <39E378F0.FEA4146E@digicool.com> <caa8usogbanoe9cc0hj1vmvem1t0tnv6hl@4ax.com>
Message-ID: <39F46C01.F1E0F22B@digicool.com>

Toby Dickenson wrote:

> FYI, there is a (mostly successful) way around this if you dont worry
> about Zope having to serve up a 304 response for this request..... set
> the following header.
> 
> Cache-Control: public, s-maxage=0, proxy-revalidate
> 
> Caches will cache the content, but always revalidate it before using
> the cached reply.

The problem is that Apache is a HTTP 1.0 caching proxy and not a HTTP
1.1 caching proxy and thus ignores the Cache-Control header entirely :(

I will be working on this feature in the medium term future- I should be
able to get near-accurate results.

Thanks,
-- 
-mindlace-
Zopatista Community Liason


From mindlace@digicool.com  Wed Oct 25 06:18:22 2000
From: mindlace@digicool.com (ethan mindlace fremen)
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 01:18:22 -0400
Subject: [ZWeb] server restart
Message-ID: <39F66D1E.2BEF67AE@digicool.com>

restarted zope at 5:20 am because it was being very slow. I'm too tired
to know why. will look into it in the morning.

-- 
-mindlace-
Zopatista Community Liason