[ZWeb] DISCUSS: Use ".html" or not?
Robert Rottermann
robert@redcor.ch
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 18:05:46 +0200
I vote for
sitemap.html
The .html in Python is not hard to handle .
No caps!
Robert
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Everitt" <paul@zope.com>
To: <zope-web@zope.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:17 PM
Subject: [ZWeb] DISCUSS: Use ".html" or not?
>
> Howdy. Let's start a war. :^)
>
> I'm about to create the site map page, which is the second link on the
> navbar. It will help us plan the building out of the content and
> section space in the site.
>
> My first decision to make is: what kind of object should this be? I'm
> going to make it a Document and treat it as content, rather than
> programming, so that it shows up in searches. Of course, this might
> come back to haunt me later if I need to put any programming in it.
> (Grr....)
>
> My second decision: what should the object id be? Choices:
>
> /SiteMap
> /SiteMap.html
> /sitemap
> /sitemap.html
>
> While this seems like a petty conversation, it is actually quite
> important. We have two kinds of decisions to make:
>
> 1) Caps scheme. If I can get away with it, I'd like to make an edict to
> banish caps and use all lower. I've grown really, really, really weary
> over the years telling people the URL to the zope 3 wiki, and saying
> "Component architecutre, capital C and capital A, front page, capital f
> and capital p, ..."
>
> 2) Extensions. Boy oh boy is this a hot potato.
>
> The first two people that tried to help me with nzo skins via WebDAV
> wanted to use Dreamweaver. The were both foiled by DW's inability to
> work with something not having an extension. Ultimately, all solutions
> that we discussed had tough tradeoffs.
>
> For both content and presentation objects, this is going to come up over
> and over and over and...
>
> So what say ye -- "sitemap" or "sitemap.html"?
>
> --Paul
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Zope-web maillist - Zope-web@zope.org
> http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-web
>