[ZWeb] Lightweight approval process using versions?

[Jens Vagelpohl]

> Don't know if this makes sense (I haven't worked with them much), but 
> why not use Zope versions for proposed changes, so that they're 
> "quarantined" for a short comment period?
>
> It seems like this would keep the site relatively stable for visitors, 
> allow interested parties to see exactly how the changes would look and 
> behave, and make implementing the change as easy as abandoning it.

Great idea, but that would spell doom for the ZODB. Versions are 
dangerous for any site that is catalog driven.

jens