[Zope] reality check
Guido A.J. Stevens
gyst@nfg.nl
12 Dec 1999 12:35:45 +0100
Hi Rik,
Just wanted to let you know you're _completely_ wrong :-). "Changing
context in Zope" is exactly what I was looking for and I find myself
referencing it frequently.
I'll take your points seriously though: after fiddling with Zope for
some weeks now I've found some errors in some documentation and I'll
contact the authors off-list.
I must say I'm quite satisfied with the Zope documentation. It's
fragmented, yes, but there's a lot of it. I've got a big pile of
printouts on my desk, bigger than anything available for PHP e.g., and
it's just a subset of what can be gotten from the Zope site. I for one
attribute my difficulties in implementing Zope more to the complexity
and huge feature-set of the Zope engine, than to a lack of
documentation. Good documentation helps, but it does not make Zope
intrinsically easier.
:*CU#
Rik Hoekstra <hoekstra@fsw.leidenuniv.nl> writes:
> Ok, that's it. Two points (ok I'm grumpy tonight)
>
> 1) I can't believe docs are really an issue with anyone. <whining
> mode> Let me take myself as an example (yes this is whining!). I have
> squeezed out three drafts of a chapter for ZBook called changing
> context in Zope. They were almost completely made up of examples.
> I got exactly one (1) response to the first draft from anyone either
> on the ZDP list or elsewhere (thanks Patrick).
>
> Now, it may well be they are completely worthless or off target, but
> then please say so, so I can save myself the trouble.
>
> Say anything. I asked for feedback repeatedly. It is not exactly
> motivating to write documentation if there is no feedback at all.
> That makes it appear as though there is no need for documentation -
> or did I get this wrong.
>
> This also what Open Source is about as far as I'm concerned- _co_
> operation</whining mode>
--
*** Guido A.J. Stevens *** mailto:gyst@nfg.nl ***
*** Net Facilities Group *** tel:+31.43.3618933 ***
*** http://www.nfg.nl *** fax:+31.43.3560502 ***