[Zope] any more information on using UserDB anywhere?
Jens Vagelpohl
tommymi@concentric.net
Wed, 28 Jul 1999 08:30:29 -0400
if i had more python experience i would love to take NotMail over, but i'm
just starting out with it
i'm a C++ weenie myself ;)
Jens Vagelpohl
> -----Original Message-----
> From: anthony@nextTelecom.com [mailto:anthony@nextTelecom.com]On Behalf
> Of Anthony Baxter
> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 1999 06:33
> To: Michel Pelletier
> Cc: 'Jens Vagelpohl'; 'Tony McDonald'; Zope List
> Subject: Re: [Zope] any more information on using UserDB anywhere?
>
>
> >>> Michel Pelletier wrote
> > I would *love* for someone to take over NotMail. It is an extremely
> > cool Zope product, fairly well written and documented in code, and not
> > needing much polish to become a super cool thing. In fact, I bet there
> > are several people on this list qualified enough to finish it off with
> > reasonable effort.
>
> There's a number of other neat-o features that can/should be added to
> NotMail, tho. Last time I looked, it opened a new imap connection for
> each web hit - eesh.
>
> Right now we're using IMP (www.horde.org) for the webmail component of
> our site. I'd _love_ to see Notmail be in a state where we can consider
> using it. It would also be cool to be able to slot other forms of
> messaging
> into the Notmail frames - why can't some of the top level entries in the
> folder list be imap server accounts, some be Confera topics, while
> others are, ooo, let's just say a voice mail box?
>
> If you take a step back, there's the Notmail core, which is the 'here is
> a folder, here is a message' and the IMAPAdaptor code, which deals with
> the IMAP specific part. No reason that you couldn't make it so you can
> plug other message stores in as well...
>
> Anthony
>