Phillip Beazley wrote: > Presumptuous? Saying I've dismissed the article and the > opinions of many savvy email folk (and I suppose you're > assuming I'm not one of them?) is presumptuous. Phillip, I took Ken's comment to mean that it would be presumptuous for Mailman to munge the reply-to header in light of the cited article, etc. Best regards, Jeff Bauer Rubicon, Inc.