[Zope] What about Postgresql as a viable database?
Thilo Mezger
thilo@gonzo.innominate.local
10 Nov 1999 07:57:17 GMT
Stuart 'Zen' Bishop <zen@cs.rmit.edu.au> wrote:
> My impression was PostgreSQL was that its main acceptance problem
> was lack of marketing. If I had to ship a product tied to an
> no-cost RDBMS I'd go with PostgreSQL or possibly Gadfly (havn't looked
> into its feature set).
yep, IMHO postgresql is the best open-source database. ok, mysql is a
lot faster but then it lacks important sql-features (triggers,
transactions, etc.) and it's not even open-source/gpl. gadfly is a
little bit too simple for as it only implements a very small subset of
sql92.
i can only recommend postgresql-6.5.2 if you need an open-source
no-cost database for some projects.
try to keep your sql as standard as possible because then you can
switch to oracle by simple replacing the zpostgresda by zoracleda...
thilo
--
mezger@innominate.de
innominate AG
networking people
fon: +49.30.308806-11 fax: -77 web: http://innominate.de pgp: /pgp/tm