[Zope] Zope in Portals
Ethan Fremen
mindlace@majordomo.net
Tue, 28 Sep 1999 16:41:23 +0100
Celso Martinho wrote:
> I'm new to this list, so escuse the dumb questions.
no problem. My first one was "zope says it doesn't have permissions to
the var directory! what's wrong?"
> I am responsable for the development team of SAPO, the most popular
> and visited Portuguese portal.
Hi, I am responsible for the (re)development of the web site for
Instituto Português de Arqueologia.
> 1. It is often mentioned that Zope is very scalable. But how does it scale?
> We currently have an architeture that consists in several backends with
> SQL databases and NFS servers and about 5 mirrored frontends with Apaches
> delivering static and dynamic web pages, load balanced by an Alteon Ace Director
> Switch. Would Zope fit in such an environment ?
http://www.zope.org/Members/4am/SiteAccess
SiteAccess is a new product that might help you handle the
mirroring/backend management. All pages from Zope are dynamic. Zope
fits fine behind Apache. I don't know the details of your load
balancing, but that should continue to work.
> 2. How well does Zope performs ? Are there any benchmarks ? I was not
> very impressed with the results of an "ab" (Apache Benchmark Program) I
> did to Zserver requesting 1000 pages with 200 concurrent requests.
What were the results? Earlier posts suggest that ZServer is good for
about 45 requests/sec.
> And how bad is it to use PCGI/Apache instead of ZServer ?
It knocks it down to about 20 requests a sec.
(performance quotes are from memory)
> Is the future of Zope focused in developing Zserver or integrating Zope
> well with other Web Server such as Apache ?
They are working on a FastCGI implementation for Zope that should
eliminate the fork penalty for using Apache, as well as allowing use
with a wider variety of other web servers. The integrated FTP and
WebDAV protocols will still require ZServer, and I don't imagine that
will change soon.
> Thank you very much for your time. I hope you can help and convince us
> to become Zopers. :)
I don't think it would be a bad decision at all. :-)
--
~mindlace
webworker