[Zope] Backup / redundancy: Is data.fs enough ?

Pavlos Christoforou pavlos@gaaros.com
Fri, 7 Apr 2000 08:53:08 -0400 (EDT)


Hi Dimitris

Backing up the Data.fs file should be enough (it does not depend on 
platform/architecture) assuming all the neccessary products are installed
on both servers.

If you want to get more fancy, the way Data.fs is written (basically
appends new transactions at the end) lends itself to very efficient
backup techniques.

Pavlos


On Fri, 7 Apr 2000, Dimitris Andrakakis wrote:

> Hi there,
> Suppose I have Zope properly installed on 2,
> not necessarily the same, servers. Say a RedHat
> on an i386 and an NT box.
> 
> My goals are two:
> 1) to be able to backup my site regularly and
> easily and
> 2) to have one of them as a main server and
> the other as a redundancy server. So if the
> Redhat fails / crashes / gets hacked / whatever
> I want the NT box (or another Redhat, it doesn't matter)
> to serve exactly the same content.
> 
> Will it be enough to keep the data.fs file and transfer
> it between the machines ? I thought that maybe this can't
> be done if the machines / OSes are different. Is this the case ?
> 
> Dimitris Andrakakis
> http://atlas.central.ntua.gr:8000/~mc94068
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
> http://im.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
> http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
> **   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
> (Related lists - 
>  http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
>  http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
>