[Zope] POLL: Preferred browser?

[JB]

Curtis Maloney wrote:
> 
In light of this POLL, I was inspired to cobble together the environment
I use and release it on the Zope site. I build some Python code which
allows me to traverse the Folders in Zope via Medusa FTP and use my own
editor to handle the DTML. I basically just view the site in Netscape
and use this.. uh.. ZopeEDIT thing to handle the DTML. I tried the emacs
ftp way, but found emacs to be too big and ugly for me. Editing in
Netscape is a nightmare because I'm so used to my key combos in my
editor. I kept deleting stuff. Now I can take advantage of all the
macros I have built for my editor and syntax highlighting too. BTW, I'm
running this on Linux but the thing is written in Python so it should be
portable. 

You can check out the product at
http://www.zope.org/Members/jimbag/ZopeEDIT/

cheers
jb

> Greetings,
> 
> Look, I don't want to start any holy wars, just to get a head count, more or
> less.  But what are peoples preferred browsers for ZOPE development?
> 
> Until now, I've been using Netscape, whilst desperately searching for some
> replacement that didn't haemorhage memory.  I think I've even managed to narrow
> down which part of NS is losing the memory (it's the edit box, which is why it
> seems to happen quicker when working with ZOPE).
> 
> However, in my searches I've yet to find ANYTHING under Linux that comes close
> to the functionality of NS.
> 
> As I said... I don't want advocacy here, simply name and version, and perhaps
> a quick rundown of the reason(s) you chose it over others.
> 
> --
> Have a better one,
>         Curtis.
> 
> <dtml-var standard_work_disclaimer>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
> http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
> **   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
> (Related lists -
>  http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
>  http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )

-- 
This is the first age that's paid much attention to the future, which is
a
little ironic since we may not have one.
		-- Arthur Clarke