[Zope] ZMethod (Safe)
   
    jpenny@universal-fasteners.com
     
    jpenny@universal-fasteners.com
       
    Wed, 8 Nov 2000 18:16:51 -0500
    
    
  
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 05:48:22PM -0500, Jason Cunliffe wrote:
> Evan Simpson <evan@4-am.com> wrote
> > > Safe and Flexible are probably more meaningful words there ;-)
> > >
> > > ZMethod is growing though ;-)
> >
> > We've pretty much settled on restricted/unrestricted here.  In honor of
> the presidential Indecision
> > 2000 race, we're seriously thinking about revamping and rerunning the
> poll, so ZMethod may well get
> > its moment in the spotlight.
> 
> lol
> 
> Good news: 'ZMethod' is nice and 'sounds' good, however one says it.
> 
> 'safe' / 'flexible'     imho=nice ideam but a little too subjective, not
> informative enough
> 
> 'restricted' / 'unrestricted'
> 
> hmm.. better because more functional, but how about:
Yes, but drives people away from the prefered option.  (restricted is
prefered!)
> 
> 
> 1. 'closed' / 'open'
Both are equally open, especially in the new 'Wild Python Thingys are
editable via the Web' paradigm.
> 
> 2. 'builtin' / 'custom'
Both are custom.
> 
> 3. 'local' / 'custom'
???
> 
> 4. 'client-side' /  'server-side'
> 
Both are server-side.
> ???
> 
> - Jason
> 
> 
>