[Zope] 2.3.0 really not Beta?

Oleg Broytmann Oleg Broytmann <phd@mail2.phd.pp.ru>
Thu, 8 Feb 2001 17:31:17 +0300 (MSK)


Hi! Really not. Perfect product! Thanks, DC guys!

On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Stephan Goeldi wrote:
> I installed 2.3.0 today and since then the Zope installation is gone away
> sometimes. Before I had 2.2.2 and 2.2.5 installed without any problems for
> MONTHS!!!!!

   I have no such problems.

> 2.3.0 seems to be a little unstable for now, and I think I will return back
> to 2.2.5 again. There are other problems with SiteRoot which worked like a
> champ for months under 2.2.5.

   Again, 2.3.0 works for me pretty nice in this aspect. I am going to
switch to VirtualHostMonster, but now I use SiteRoot, and I am satsified.

> I don't understand why it can be declared as 'stable' with such behaving.
> Where these bugs not detected in beta phase?

   It was declared "stable" exactly because no one caugth such behaviour.
In the world of free software it is *you* who test software, send patches
to authors, etc. No one ought to do something special for you. Why didn't
you test 2.3 betas and caught these errors? Ah, you want only stable
software! Then pay for it! Either you must (I said "must") pay with your
time (test betas, make patches) or you can pay money. Buy a contract. DC
will provide you with all neccessary details about their contracts.
   Good luck!

Oleg.
----
     Oleg Broytmann     http://www.zope.org/Members/phd/     phd@phd.pp.ru
           Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.