[Zope] Q: Verifying the poll numbers
BZ
bz@bwanazulia.com
21 May 2001 16:10:50 -0000
First of all... documentation was not on the poll... :)
Ok. Now for the real question. What would I pay for a authoring tool?
Well, assuming it had the following:
- No OS Dependancy (runs on anything from Windows 95 -> OS X)
- Small application size
- A good set of features (Color coding)
As an individual I would pay up to $75.
BZ
On Mon, 21 May 2001 07:22:33 -0400, Paul Everitt <paul@digicool.com> wrote :
>
> Howdy folks. AndyM is running a poll over at ZopeZen:
>
> http://www.zopezen.org/
> (Look at the bottom of the left margin)
>
> < spoiler warning>
>
> Before reading the rest of this message, please vote. I
> don't want to bias your response. And don't peek at the
> results before you vote!
>
> </spoiler warning>
>
> OK, on to the discussion. Are those numbers *really* accurate? I gotta
> admit, though I've had a soft spot in my heart for the Zope Studio
> thing, I'm stunned that it would be in front. Much less so *far* in
> front. Are these results an accurate reading of the sentiments -- that
> given the list of choices Andy presented, a Zope Studio is so much more
> popular than those choices!?!
>
> Wow. Let's try a different tack. Pretend there was a for-free Zope
> Studio and a for-fee Zope Studio. Let's say the difference was either
> like ActiveState's difference (personal use vs. professional use), or
> say the difference was in "Professional" capabilities.
>
> Does anyone think there would be any moderate-sized market for a for-fee
> version? How many of you would pay a few hundred bucks for a
> high-quality dev/authoring/admin environment for Zope?
>
> --Paul
>
> _______________________________________________
> Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
> http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
> ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
> (Related lists -
> http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
> http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
>
>
>