[Zope] Templates a step backwards?
Lee Braiden
jel@ntlworld.com
04 Jan 2002 00:42:24 +0000
--=-WD+mGxuFGJ5HGcRYuEHb
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, 2002-01-04 at 00:24, sean.upton@uniontrib.com wrote:
> I was reading through last months CMF list archives, and saw some similar
> sentiments; I would have to disagree, as someone who has worked with both
> ZPT and DTML enough to know the ups and downs to both. Here's my take, f=
or
> what it is worth. I like ZPT...
Thanks Sean & Ron, your suggestions sound pretty good, I'll get to work
on figuring out METAL asap =3D^)
ohhh, and Sean...
> - force designers to write well-formed HTML; you would be surprised...
Nope, I wouldn't. I've seen that particular form of evil. Nothing like
trying to write a nice clean XHTML site with your boss throwing in
circa-Netscape2 HTML ;)
- Lee.
--=-WD+mGxuFGJ5HGcRYuEHb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQA8NPpvHTniXHX3J7wRAqRrAJ9Qwp5UqG1Hb7AWmIY28Gr/hsTWCgCfXpfW
XGrBOEQ6HjhR+WCG9mbPOqE=
=RWbN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-WD+mGxuFGJ5HGcRYuEHb--