[Zope] Completely OT: ftp vs scp
Jerome Alet
alet@unice.fr
Tue, 12 Mar 2002 15:47:44 +0100 (MET)
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Oleg Broytmann wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 03:14:26PM +0100, Jerome Alet wrote:
> >
> > tunnelling over ssh or native rsync protocol
> > transparent compression
> > more easily scriptable
>
> FTP, on the other hand, has the advantages:
>
> 1. Interactiveness (directory listing).
ssh user@remote ls remote_directory
or :
rsync -e ssh user@remote:remote_directory
> 2. Well-established.
depends on what you need to do, for most end users ftp is all we can ask
to them, unfortunately...
> 3. Simple to implement.
I don't know.
> 4. Already there (in the Zope :)
You're right with this one.
The biggest advantage IMHO, with rsync is that it doesn't need any new
port opened if you tunnel it through ssh, so it's easier to secure a box.
so the same ssh port will give you both complete remote control of the box
and the rsync possibilities.
bye,
Jerome Alet