[Zope] My Zope is leaking memory ...
Jean-Francois.Doyon@CCRS.NRCan.gc.ca
Jean-Francois.Doyon@CCRS.NRCan.gc.ca
Mon, 25 Nov 2002 14:28:33 -0500
Charlie,
Thanks for pointing this out! I'm not sure though ...
Now that you mention it though, when I look in the Debug page, the one
object type that has a delta WAY above the others is the
DateTime.DateTime.DateTime object ... I'll try to keep a look at the
toprefcount to see if it grows abnormally ... And I will keep an eye out =
for
the Acquisition.ImplicitAcquirerWrapper counts and delta's to see if ther=
e's
anything weird going on there ...
Heh, in the time I've been typing this, the Delta for the DateTime is 901=
4
!!! The top refcount for it is 44618 now ... I allways thought these high
numbers were to be expected, since something like DateTime gets used a lo=
t I
presume. The top refcount for Acquisition.ImplicitAcquirerWrapper is 56 .=
..
I'm starting to look at upgrading to 2.6, but we're not there just yet, I
have to learn a couple more things about writing your own products and CM=
F
portal types first :)
Thanks for the tips!
J.F.
-----Original Message-----
From: Charlie Reiman [mailto:creiman@kefta.com]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 2:05 PM
To: Jean-Francois.Doyon@CCRS.NRCan.gc.ca; zope@zope.org
Subject: RE: [Zope] My Zope is leaking memory ...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: zope-admin@zope.org [mailto:zope-admin@zope.org]On Behalf Of
> Jean-Francois.Doyon@CCRS.NRCan.gc.ca
> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 10:57 AM
> To: zope@zope.org
> Subject: [Zope] My Zope is leaking memory ...
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Yup, that's right, my Zope is leaking memory, and so far, I've had no l=
uck
> figuring out where it might come from. I run a Zope 2.5.0 on RedHat 7.3.
>
> I started by looking into the Python/C type modules, which I
> fugred are most
> likely to be causing this. I upgraded Psycopg to the latest version, b=
ut
> it's still occuring. I also use the PIL, but it is seldom used, and co=
uld
> not be the cause of the kind of leakage I'm seeing. Then there's
> a much more
> obscure thing, which is a SWIG interface to PROJ.4 (A geographical
> projection library) ... I had the author look at it, and no leaks were
> detected in the C library, or using the SWIG interface (Using Valgrind=
I
> beleive). My Z SQL Methods do NOT cache results (Maximum time set 0).
>
> I'm using a custom built (with default configuration) Python 2.1.3 ...
>
> The symptom: I run Zope with -t 6 due to the site being very busy. Ther=
e's
> 1GB of RAM. When I first start Zope, it the memory of the process runni=
ng
> running the threads is around 10% (as shown in "ps"). Here, now
> after 4 days
> 19 hours up:
>
> root 943 0.0 0.1 5024 1456 ? S Nov20 0:00
> /usr/local/bin/python2.1 /usr/local/Zope-2.5.0/z2.py -a 132.156.10.87 -=
t 6
> -w 8080 -p - -f - -D
> nobody 946 0.8 40.4 470040 417420 ? S Nov20 60:26
> /usr/local/bin/python2.1 /usr/local/Zope-2.5.0/z2.py -a 132.156.10.87 -=
t 6
> -w 8080 -p - -f - -D
> nobody 950 0.0 40.4 470040 417420 ? S Nov20 0:03
> /usr/local/bin/python2.1 /usr/local/Zope-2.5.0/z2.py -a 132.156.10.87 -=
t 6
> -w 8080 -p - -f - -D
> nobody 951 3.8 40.4 470040 417420 ? S Nov20 266:02
> /usr/local/bin/python2.1 /usr/local/Zope-2.5.0/z2.py -a 132.156.10.87 -=
t 6
> -w 8080 -p - -f - -D
> nobody 952 3.8 40.4 470040 417420 ? S Nov20 264:41
> /usr/local/bin/python2.1 /usr/local/Zope-2.5.0/z2.py -a 132.156.10.87 -=
t 6
> -w 8080 -p - -f - -D
> nobody 953 3.7 40.4 470040 417420 ? S Nov20 262:58
> /usr/local/bin/python2.1 /usr/local/Zope-2.5.0/z2.py -a 132.156.10.87 -=
t 6
> -w 8080 -p - -f - -D
> nobody 954 3.8 40.4 470040 417420 ? S Nov20 267:13
> /usr/local/bin/python2.1 /usr/local/Zope-2.5.0/z2.py -a 132.156.10.87 -=
t 6
> -w 8080 -p - -f - -D
> nobody 955 4.3 40.4 470040 417420 ? S Nov20 299:51
> /usr/local/bin/python2.1 /usr/local/Zope-2.5.0/z2.py -a 132.156.10.87 -=
t 6
> -w 8080 -p - -f - -D
> nobody 956 3.8 40.4 470040 417420 ? S Nov20 265:31
> /usr/local/bin/python2.1 /usr/local/Zope-2.5.0/z2.py -a 132.156.10.87 -=
t 6
> -w 8080 -p - -f - -D
>
> Memory usage is at 40.4 percent ...
>
> In another 4 days, it will have reached almost 60%, and I will restart =
it
> ... Basically, after a week, it gets to be too much.
>
> As far as ZODB Caching, here are my numbers right now:
>
> Total objects in DB: 44786
> Total objects in all caches: 30290 (This is peak actually, it
> varies between
> 26K and 30K depending on time of day).
> Target size: 5000
> Max time: 300
>
> When packed my Data.fs is under 100Mb ...
>
> The memory keeps growing regardless of the caching going on with the
> database, so that's not the issue.
>
> The site takes millions of this ever week ...
>
> So now I'm running out of ideas to try and track this down, I was
> hoping it
> would be the PROJ interface/library ... But apparently not (Even then t=
he
> leakage would probably be much smaller than what we're seeing here).
>
> Does anyone know how I might go about tracking this down further?
> I know of
> the Medusa monitor thing, but I wouldn't know the first thing on how to
> start using that to track memory usage, if it is even possible.
>
> Right now I'm wondering about the PostgreSQL usage ... It is the
> only thing
> that has intensive enough usage to leak this much memory I think ...
>
> Any ideas, comments, insights, tips would be MOST appreciated!
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Jean-Fran=E7ois Doyon
> Internet Service Development and Systems Support
> GeoAccess Division
> Canada Center for Remote Sensing
> Natural Resources Canada
> http://atlas.gc.ca
> Phone: (613) 992-4902
> Fax: (613) 947-2410
Look under Control Panel:Debug. There is a display of current object
allocations. You can refresh to see deltas.
There a good chance you are exercising a known Zope bug:
http://collector.zope.org/Zope/421
This is fixed in 2.6 and there a patch for 2.5.1 on the collector issue.