[Zope] Apache-Squid-Zope, Squid-Apache-Zope.. or just Squid-Zope?

[Andreas Jung]

To make it short:

- use Apache+Zope if you have a smaller website and you don't like to
  hurt your brain about the 1000 configuration options of Squid.

- use Squid-Zope if you have a high volume website and have some
  experiences with Squid. Apache offers less related configuration
  options than you have fingers at your hand. Squid has more
  than a hundred.

-> Apache+Zope=easy to use, easy to setup
-> Squid+Zope=requires more work and you should know what you're doing.

-aj

--On Dienstag, 5. November 2002 01:24 -0500 Ausum Studio 
<ausum_studio@hotmail.com> wrote:

> I know this has been treated before, but as much as I can see, people use
> the three ways with apparent success.
> Within the context that ZC is funding Squid to implement ESI, would any
> member of the community try a theoretical resume (not a how-to) of the
> issues regarding using Squid to cache Zope? Which one of the three
> combinations is the best?
>
>
> Ausum
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jo Meder" <jo@meder.de>
>> (...)
>> We're using Apache in
>> front of Squid in front of Zope to implement virtual hosts and caching
>> wherever possible btw.
>>
>> Jo.
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
> http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
> **   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
> (Related lists -
>  http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
>  http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )




    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
   -    Andreas Jung                     http://www.andreas-jung.com   -
  -   EMail: andreas at andreas-jung.com                              -
   -            "Life is too short to (re)write parsers"               -
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------