[Zope] Programmatic creation/update of ZSQL methods
Charlie Reiman
creiman@kefta.com
Thu, 31 Oct 2002 13:39:22 -0800
After thinking about it more, it looks like this (HTTP POST) will be the way
to go. Directly accessing the ZODB is nifty but would involve stopping Zope
while I update which just adds a step to my process.
Still, I'm disappointed that xmlrpc can't do this. I thought it would
support everything I can do via HTTP plus more. And I was so looking forward
to being buzzword compliant. Ah well, live and learn.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: zope-admin@zope.org [mailto:zope-admin@zope.org]On Behalf Of
> Clemens Robbenhaar
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 12:27 PM
> To: zope@zope.org
> Subject: [Zope] Programmatic creation/update of ZSQL methods
>
>
>
> Charlie Reiman writes:
> > I've got about 60 or so ZSQL methods that I maintain in my
> Zope. Actually, I
> > don't maintain them: our Oracle expert changes them then I
> have to translate
> > them into DTML, split them into little chunks, and upload them
> into zope.
> >
> > Since I'm terribly lazy I've automated the DTMLification and
> the splitting.
> > But the third step of uploading the ZSQL bodies is tricker.
> Currently I'm
> > uploading them via FTP but this requires that the methods
> already exist (due
> > to a lack of object type magic). I've also tried using xmlrpc but
> > manage_addZSQLMethod does not seem to live on Folder so I'm
> not sure how I
> > can call it.
> >
> > So my question is: How can I create ZSQL methods from an
> external program (a
> > python script in this case)? I've got the body, the id, the
> destination, the
> > connection id, the parameters... everything but a clue.
>
> Its maybe ugly, but how about faking the ZMI form by doing something
> like:
>
> lynx -dump -auth admin:clear_text_passwd \
>
> 'http://localhost:8080/my_sql_folder/manage_addZSQLMethod?id=new_s
ql_method&title=foo&connection_id=my_db&arguments=&template:text=select+*'
Afterwards the SQL method should be there and may be edited via FTP.
Or is this too ugly? Maybe someone else one the list knows a better way
to add arbitrary typed objects programatically.
Cheers,
Clemens