[Zope] people structuring
Roman Bogoyev
roman at maths.uwa.edu.au
Tue Sep 23 10:38:07 EDT 2003
>
>
>Why do you have containers for the different types of persons?
>
>A more natural thing would be to have just one container and
>use catalog searches (or "topic"s) to determine the subsets
>as necessary.
>
My thoughts were that people are spread across our organisiation in
different groupings, and
may belong to more than one grouping. Other 'objects' may contain these
groups eg: a unit object
has one or more lecturers, as well as many students. A committee object
has members etc.
What I wanted was to find a way to keep to the object oriented spirit of
zope/python and to
be able to express things like
funCommittee.members.joe.shoeSize
and
mathsClass.lecturers.joe.shoeSize
where joe's shoe size is not a property of 'joe the lecturer' or 'joe
the committee member' but of 'joe the person'.
And wouldn't it be nice if for some reason joe's feet swelled during
lecturing and had a different size, and
mathsClass.lecturers.joe.shoeSize could return the correct shoeSize in
this context! (Something similar to
aquisition but not quite as Units may not be within the Person
structure). Maybe I want a "Link Object"
product where 'joe the lecturer' is just a link to 'joe the person' but
with aquisition rules following the link heirarchy.
The above is probably mostly fantasy, so I'll investigate doing it with
catalogues but don't know if it will be as pretty.
Thanks,
Roman.
More information about the Zope
mailing list