[Zope] Zope is a POS.
Garito
garito at sistes.net
Thu Oct 14 11:06:44 EDT 2004
Hermann Himmelbauer wrote:
>On Wednesday 13 October 2004 22:47, Garito wrote:
>
>
>>Andreas Jung wrote:
>>
>>
>>>--On Mittwoch, 13. Oktober 2004 9:15 Uhr -0700 Jason Leach
>>>
>>><jason.leach at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>0. No standard DB support.
>>>>I don't think ZPoPyDa has been updated since 2001. I'm sure that
>>>>fills new developers with lots of confidence. Perhaps it works fine,
>>>>but it's not being improved. Perhaps other DB interfaces are better.
>>>>But then again ZSQL Methods are still ancient and in DTML.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>There are enough DB adapters available for nearly every DB available.
>>>DAs are not shipped with the Zope core. If you need a particular DA
>>>you can easily download and install it. What is your problem with ZSQL
>>>methods? They are known to work fine (as instance in the ZODb or on
>>>the filesystem). Do you know a better framework for specifying
>>>SQl queries in a generic way?
>>>
>>>
>>This is my opinion and only my opinion: I think Zope has a DB (object
>>oriented one). For that, I think that DB connectors are for backward
>>compatibility with your ancien software but I would like to migrate data
>>
>>
>
>I'm no specialist, but I think that's not true: An object oriented database is
>perfect for storing objects. But there are cases where you just don't need to
>store objects and the relational model fits better. Table joins and things
>like that are handy and surely not "ancient".
>
>Moreover relational databases are nowadays very stable and proven, support
>special hardware, scale extremely well etc.
>
>Regards,
>Hermann
>
>
>
Then why use object oriented aproach?
If I think object and then store "data" I need a conversion but If I
think objects and store objects no conversion needed, isn't it?
Sometimes is difficult to change our minds
Cheers!
More information about the Zope
mailing list