[Zope] Re: why will FastCGI not be supported in the Future.

[Chris Withers]

Dieter Maurer wrote:
> The original poster explained his wish to retain FCGI:
> 
>   It reuses an existing connection between Apache and Zope
>   while (he thinks and I might believe it) the recommended
>   "mod_proxy" way each time opens a new connection.
> 
>   Thus, FastCGI might be more efficient.

Show me some evidence proving that fcgi or mod_proxy is the significant 
limiting performance factor in a setup involving zope and I'll take this 
seriously ;-)

Chris

-- 
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
            - http://www.simplistix.co.uk