[Zope] documentation defacement

[Chris Withers]

Hi Fred,

Fred Drake wrote:

> Hmm.  If the version on zope.org is not canonical, it shouldn't be
> editable (annotatable, yes, but not editable).

Indeed. I don't think the BackTalk feature has really helped all that 
much, people just abuse it :-(

> I'd really like to see documentation maintained like other sources,
> using a revision control system (Subversion would be ideal, but CVS
> would be a step forward, IMO).  Having yet another place to go doesn't
> help.

There is a sourceforge project for this, how do we go about using it?

cheers,

Chris

-- 
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
            - http://www.simplistix.co.uk