[Zope] why will FastCGI not be supported in the Future.

[Gerhard Schmidt]

On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 01:07:49PM +0000, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> 
> On 28 Nov 2005, at 13:05, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
> 
> >On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:43:44PM +0000, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> >>
> >>On 28 Nov 2005, at 12:28, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
> >>>I know there is a way to do just the same with mod_proxy, but
> >>>mod_proxy does
> >>>open new connection for every request while fastcgi uses the same
> >>>connection
> >>>for all requests. The is no problem on low load. But with growing
> >>>load, this
> >>>can become a Problem.
> >>
> >>Well, it's not "a way to do it", it's *the* way.
> >
> >Thats a real good argument. There is no *the* way. Every situation
> >is different and having as mutch possibilities as possible is  
> >allways the
> >best way to do it.
> 
> It's a matter of resources, plain and simple. No one has stepped  
> forward to support it, so it atrophied. If you think it's a great  
> thing to keep, volunteer.

I would if I had the time and the knowlege. But I don't see a Problem 
with the Code right now. As I said i runs here perfectly smooth.

Bye
	Estartu 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gerhard Schmidt    | Nick : estartu      IRC : Estartu  |
Fischbachweg 3     |                                    |  PGP Public Key
86856 Hiltenfingen | EMail: estartu at augusta.de          |  on request 
Germany            | 					|  


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 466 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope/attachments/20051128/183b2f44/attachment.bin