[Zope] DateTime mess
    Chris Withers 
    chris at simplistix.co.uk
       
    Tue Nov 29 04:39:36 EST 2005
    
    
  
Lennart Regebro wrote:
> Just a note: I don't think mixing in persistance is needed. 
Hmm... how so? I've always thought it quite nice that when, for example, 
you store the modification time of an object in a DateTime, you can 
safely update it without worrying about the whole object having to be 
repickled when you change it...
> CalZope
> uses datetime objects straight off the rocks, (as attributes to
> SimpleItems) and they persist just fine. :-)
Yes, they will, but that's not the point ;-)
> There is no default timezone implementation, though. Zope3 has one I
> think, so it could be used.
Yes, I'd verymuch like to see Zope 2 and 3 end up with the same datetime 
and timezone story, but one that does involve persistence...
cheers,
Chris
-- 
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
            - http://www.simplistix.co.uk
    
    
More information about the Zope
mailing list