[Zope] Zope 2.8 or 3.1?

[Andrew Sawyers]

I meant to send a reply to the list.  The gist of my offlist response to
Harald was:

“We use lots and lots of Centos 4.x servers in heavy production with no
problems.  Go for it.”

 

Andrew Sawyers

Zope Corporation

Zope Managed Hosting

Software Engineer

 

  _____  

From: zope-bounces at zope.org [mailto:zope-bounces at zope.org] On Behalf Of
Doyon, Jean-Francois
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 4:40 PM
To: 'HaraldFinnås'; zope at zope.org
Subject: RE: [Zope] Zope 2.8 or 3.1?

 

I'm using Zope 2.7.x on RHEL 3.x without trouble ... Though I should be
upgrading to CentOS 4.x fairly soon ... what problems have you heard of?

 

As for Zope, if you're not sure, then you probably want 2.8.x ... 3.1 is
stable, but for lower level development ... also depends what features you
need ... some CMF things aren't avilable in it yet.

 

J.F.

 

  _____  

From: zope-bounces at zope.org [mailto:zope-bounces at zope.org] On Behalf Of
HaraldFinnås
Sent: October 26, 2005 4:43 PM
To: zope at zope.org
Subject: [Zope] Zope 2.8 or 3.1?


I'm new to Zope, and I've been playing with 2.8.1, but I really haven't done
any real work with it yet. Now I expect to get my new decicated Zope
hardware tomorrow, so I have to decide if I should go for 2.8.4 or 3.1.0.
Any tips if I should go for the latest and greatest or stick with 2.8? 

I've also seen comments that running Zope on RHEL/CentOS might not be wise.
My test env. is using FC4, but I'm planning to install CenOS 4.2 on the
production server. Unwise choice? 

Regards, 
Harald 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope/attachments/20051026/3a4e6f42/attachment.htm