POUND/VHM AND ZOPE HELL!!! was: Re: [Zope] Can't Find This Bug!

[beno -]

replies-lists-zope at listmail.innovate.net wrote:i would suggest that you find out the ipnumbers of the users who are
having problems. with that information, then search your logs for
entries for their connections, and examine those. that way you'll
likely have a better idea of what to look at.

Right, good idea :) Here are the beginnings of some of those numbers:

66.185
204.8
70.85
12.161

I opened Z2.log and tried to find those number like this:

/66.185

but nothing came of it. So I tried things like this:

grep "66.185" /var/log/messages

and nothing came up that way either :( What do?

[between your cookies and javascript i did find the one site unusable -
i default to having both off and your site just kept looping.]

You must be using Firefox with plug-ins. I have the same problem, although people who use a more stripped-down version of FF apparently don't.

Thanks,
beno



------------ Original Message ------------
> Date: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 07:34:26 AM -0700
> From: beno - 

> To: zope at zope.org
> Subject: POUND AND ZOPE HELL!!! was: Re: [Zope] Can't Find This Bug!
> 
> To summarize, I'm newly using Pound as a reverse-proxy for Zope. I'm
> using VHM mapping to pass the requests to the appropriate folders in
> Zope. I have some clients who can't see their sites, but I and many
> others can. They get this message: "Zope \n Welcome to Web.vi" which
> is my site (web.vi). I can see the sites just fine. And I can't find
> a bug anywhere!!!
> 
> jens wrote:
> 
>>> "Posted with no comments"?? You can read, can you? This is now the
>>> third time (read: 3) that I'm telling  you that these entries are
>>> not errors. NotFound (or 404) is completely normal. Stop looking at
>>> them! 
> 
> Okay, okay, BUT JENS... It's been over a WEEK that my client can't
> see her site AND I DON'T KNOW WHY!!  Here's what I'm doing:
> * Checking the error log for messages. The only ones I get are the
> ones you say are normal (even with those brackets "[" and "]", right?)
> * Checking the Z2.log and find nothing amiss.
> * What else should I check?
> I'm desperate! Please understand!!
>  
> Here are examples (to which Jens complains) from Z2.log of client
> sites that apparently don't render for many people trying to hit
> them, but these examples look perfectly normal to me:
> 
> 202.71.106.119 - Anonymous [16/Aug/2006:00:27:36 +0000] "GET
> /800/s/c/x/en-us/EMarket/Our_Store/marketItems/fetchPhotoThumb?s
> ku=F-0400 HTTP/1.1" 200 24163
> "http://blackbeardale.com/800/s/c/x/en-us/EMarket/Our_Store/Main_fram
> e.pt?category=foxys_lager"  "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0;
> Windows NT 5.1; SV1)"
> 202.71.106.119 - Anonymous [16/Aug/2006:00:27:36 +0000] "GET
> /800/s/c/x/en-us/EMarket/Our_Store/marketItems/fetchPhotoThumb?s
> ku=F-0450 HTTP/1.1" 200 12894
> "http://blackbeardale.com/800/s/c/x/en-us/EMarket/Our_Store/Main_fram
> e.pt?category=foxys_lager"  "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0;
> Windows NT 5.1; SV1)"
> 202.71.106.119 - Anonymous [16/Aug/2006:00:27:37 +0000] "GET
> /800/s/c/x/en-us/EMarket/Our_Store/marketItems/fetchPhotoThumb?s
> ku=F-0480 HTTP/1.1" 200 37165
> "http://blackbeardale.com/800/s/c/x/en-us/EMarket/Our_Store/Main_fram
> e.pt?category=foxys_lager"  "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0;
> Windows NT 5.1; SV1)"
> 202.71.106.119 - Anonymous [16/Aug/2006:00:27:37 +0000] "GET
> /800/s/c/x/en-us/EMarket/Our_Store/marketItems/fetchPhotoThumb?s
> ku=F-0500 HTTP/1.1" 200 15901
> "http://blackbeardale.com/800/s/c/x/en-us/EMarket/Our_Store/Main_fram
> e.pt?category=foxys_lager"  "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0;
> Windows NT 5.1; SV1)"
> 
>>> To be honest, looking at the insane JavaScript stuff that you
>>> invoke several times over before even  showing any content I am
>>> surprised anyone can view the site. You should ditch all the
>>> useless code  that tries several times over to guess screen sizes.
>>> If you actually paid someone to write that steaming  pile of
>>> JavaScript you need to get a lawyer. 
>  
> Sorry you don't like my JS, Jens. I'm happy with it. But I thought
> perhaps it might be somehow interfere with the rendering of the site
> for the client, even though it hadn't before I went to Pound. So I
> replaced it with a bare-bones DTML page for the index_html and it
> still didn't render for the client. 3
> TIA,
> beno
> 
>     
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
>  Everyone is raving about the  all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.

---------- End Original Message ----------




 		
---------------------------------
Stay in the know. Pulse on the new Yahoo.com.  Check it out. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope/attachments/20060816/62f106a6/attachment-0001.htm