[Zope] MailBoxer Question

[Chris Withers]

beno wrote:
> Chris Withers wrote:
>> beno wrote:
>>> As far as Andreas' comment of switching to Mailman, dunno why, but 
>>> Mailman requires cgi scripts, and I use Pound as reverse proxy 
>>> directly to Zope, 
>>
>> Why don't you use Apache, like every other sane individual out there?
> Actually, there are a *lot* of people who *don't* use Apache! 

What? There are more of you? As I said before: "dear god nooooo!"

> Here's 
> why: Apache duplicates 95% of what Zope's server does, 

You really have absolutely no clue do you?

> so if you're only 
> using Zope, then it's un-elegant to use Apache. 

...much like your english. The word you're looking for in inelegant:

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=inelegant

> Not a good, clean 
> solution at all! 

Say it again sam, it's still bollocks...

> Besides, the rewrite rules you have to throw at Apache 
> are awkward, 

?!
(I'm speachless, and that doesn't happen often...)

> and that's the reason why!  However, Zope can't handle cgi 
> scirpts,

...or even cgi scripts, no matter how much clueless eejets like yourself 
keep trying to ram than pesky square peg into the funny round shaped hole.

> and Mailman uses cgi scripts.

A P A C H E

> That's one reason I don't want 
> Mailman. 

numpty.

> Furthermore, MailBoxer could be more easily integrated into 
> Plone,

Hahaha... you said the P word...

> Will *you* answer my question?

In a word: no.

Chris

-- 
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
            - http://www.simplistix.co.uk