[Zope] What did your Zope server do in 2005?

Jake jake at zopezone.com
Wed Jan 4 11:49:33 EST 2006


So it looks like I have the most traffic but use the weakest box. :)

Jake
_______________________
http://www.ZopeZone.com


On Tue, January 3, 2006 4:42 pm, Richard Jones said:
> On Wednesday 04 January 2006 02:11, Kirk Strauser wrote:
>> On Monday 02 January 2006 08:10, Jake wrote:
>> > I sent this out last year and thought it would be fun to see how
>> > Zope's did in 2005.
>> >
>> > Pages:6,580,999
>> > Hits: 37,137,283
>> > Bandwidth: 142.12 GB
>> > Hardware: AMD Athlon 64 3200+ 2.0Ghz, 2GB DDR Ram, SCSI Raid 1, RH ES
>> > 2.1
>> > Zope: 2.7.4, CMF 1.4.7, Plone 2.0.5
>>
>> What did you gather that information with?  Just parsing the log files?
>>
>> Anyway, here's ours:
>>
>> Pages: 2.9 million (approx)
>> Hardward: Xeon 2.4GHz (HTT disabled), 2GB RAM, FreeBSD 6.0, single
>> SCSI-320
>> drive.
>> Zope: 8 instances of 2.7.8, hanging off a single ZEO server, and
>> load-balanced (random selection) by an Apache 2.0.55 proxy on the same
>> machine.
>
> I don't have complete stats for the whole year, but from Feb 2005 to today
> we
> did:
>
> Hits: 23,359,722
> Pages: 10,977,747
> Peak rate: 18,998 hits per hour
> Setup: 2 dual AMD Opteron 244 machines, 2GB RAM, Debian, with
>      pydirector load-balancing them and apache out the front with the
>      vhost mappings (we have a bazillion vhosts). One machine is also ZEO
>      server with lotsa RAID disk, the other is just a grunt box with
>      CPU, RAM and little else.
> Zope: 2.7.6
>
> We have five ZEO clients (one per CPU plus an extra). One of them is
> dedicated
> to serving search-engine bot traffic so that the other clients (and hence
> regular users) aren't affected when they decide to spider *all* of our
> vhosts
> at once. Which they do, on a regular basis. Currently we see the majority
> of
> our traffic handled by the first of the other four ZEO clients, but at
> peak
> load times the others two see a trickle of hits. I expect we could double
> the
> current load, and we are anticipating an increase in load this year of at
> least that. It's a good thing that dual-Opteron machines are cheap.
>
>
>     Richard
> _______________________________________________
> Zope maillist  -  Zope at zope.org
> http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
> **   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
> (Related lists -
>  http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
>  http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
>




More information about the Zope mailing list