[Zope] Re: Zope vs Plone: performance issues!

[Alexander Limi]

Check out CacheFu and it's accompanying tutorial.

http://plone.org/products/cachefu
http://plone.org/products/cachefu/documentation/how-to/crash-course

CacheFu is being used on plone.org at the moment.

Neither Zope nor Plone are proper delivery systems, and if you want  
performance, you should read up on caching.

-- Alexander Limi

On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 06:08:44 -0800, Hugo Ramos  
<ramosh at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I'm responsible for a big corporate intranet and corporate portal.
> They were using Zope/Plone before I got here and the problems are too  
> many.
>
> Let's talk about performance issues... Plone is VERY SLOW responding
> requests. All content is stored in ZODB objects and zcatalog is used
> to search. But even if you request the intranet home only, it takes
> about 10 seconds to load. The hardware is very good and lots of ram is
> used in the servers.
>
> They also have zeo + 2 zope instances running in the same machine.
> I've never seen this in my life... only 3 machines running 2 zope
> instances + zeo instance, separately.
>
> Do you think Zope(logic)+MySQL(content)+Apache(HTTP server) is better
> solution than Zope+Plone ???
>
> TIA
>
> --
> Hugo Ramos - ramosh at gmail.com
> Senior Zope consultant
> _______________________________________________
> Zope maillist  -  Zope at zope.org
> http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
> **   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
> (Related lists -
>  http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
>  http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
>



-- 
_____________________________________________________________________

      Alexander Limi · Chief Architect · Plone Solutions · Norway

  Consulting · Training · Development · http://www.plonesolutions.com
_____________________________________________________________________

       Plone Co-Founder · http://plone.org · Connecting Content
   Plone Foundation · http://plone.org/foundation · Protecting Plone