[Zope] Re: Re: Re: Zope to ldif
Sam Stainsby
sam at stainsby.id.au
Sat May 13 00:39:53 EDT 2006
On Fri, 12 May 2006 10:55:29 +0100, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On 12 May 2006, at 10:42, Sam Stainsby wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 12 May 2006 09:41:53 +0100, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>>
>>> Just out of curiosity, why do you use PAM-LDAP with Apache as opposed
>>> to mod_auth_ldap?
>>
>> Good question. No major reason, but we expect to use PAM LDAP for
>> other
>> services on our servers, since LDAP centrally controls our
>> authentication, so I took the more general solution.
>
> Ah, I'd be worried whether adding the additional layer (PAM) isn't
> going to slow you down.
>
> jens
Its only an intranet web server, not a public one, so the traffic isn't
huge. I expect that the true bottleneck will lie in communicating with the
LDAP server over the WAN rather than the local authentication method.
More information about the Zope
mailing list