[Zope] Re: request.locale - do we have this in 2.9.4?
Chris Withers
chris at simplistix.co.uk
Thu Sep 7 08:57:37 EDT 2006
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>> Funny, I've never used either in 6 years of zoping ;-)
>
> Me neither, but are we prepared to break the apps of the people who do?
I'd assert that no-one does...
> (Btw, just thought of another one possible name clash: 'response')
no-one uses that is Zope 2 land 'cos of RESPONSE...
> I've thought about introducing the adaption approach now. I think we'd
> be opening a can of worms since the request objects are likely to be
> passed from old style code to new style code and vice versa.
I think it's worth at least trying...
> I'll repeat this again: Just because Zope 3 libraries ship with Zope 2
> doesn't mean that everything from the 'zope' namespace has to work. Five
> has never made that promise.
Indeed, but in this circumstance, they probably should ;-)
> That said, *if* we choose to go with such a configuration option, I
> think it woudl probably be a good idea to have it disabled by default in
> the first release and enabled in subsequent releases. That way
> applications could opt in for the new behaviour earlier than necessary
> (much like Python's __future__ imports).
OK, I'll buy that, annoying though it'll be for everyone (no-one has
spoken up to say "you're gonna break all my code is you use debug, or
locale, or response" ;-) )
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
More information about the Zope
mailing list